Renzo Olivo vs Adhithya Ganesan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 May at 02:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Olivo vs A. Ganesan

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Olivo 1 - 0 Ganesan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Renzo Olivo winning 2 and Adhithya Ganesan winning 1. The last match between Renzo Olivo and Adhithya Ganesan was at the M25 Orlando, 25-05-2025, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Renzo Olivo getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Olivo | 1 |
| Ganesan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) M25 Orlando(05-25-25)
R. Olivo vs A. Ganesan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $517,870 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.52% (475-447) | Career Total W/L | 55.45% (56-45) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Olivo vs A. Ganesan Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve efficiency, Ganesan slightly outperforms Olivo, winning 45.36% of points compared to 44.68% for Olivo. This slight edge could influence the match outcome.
- Considering return game statistics, Ganesan holds an advantage by winning 46.78% of opponents' second serves, while Olivo secures 46.14%. For first serve returns, Ganesan also leads slightly with 32.74% over Olivo’s 32.35%.
- Under pressure situations, Ganesan excels by saving 53.44% of breakpoints, compared to Olivo's 50.3%. Could this be pivotal in high-pressure moments?
- Performance over the past year shows that Ganesan boasts a higher winning percentage, attaining 57.14%, whereas Olivo has 52.24% across matches played.
- Both players perform best on clay; however, Ganesan shows superior proficiency with a win rate of 63% compared to Olivo's 53%.
- Analyzing player levels, Ganesan has mainly competed in and excelled at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, securing a 58.33% win rate, surpassing Olivo’s 44.9% in Challengers/ITF events.
- Despite playing against higher-ranked opponents on average (rank 346.52), Olivo’s success in deciding sets is notable, winning 68% compared to Ganesan’s 55%.
- Break point conversion stats highlight Ganesan's strength, converting 40.45% compared to Olivo’s 30.38%, potentially crucial in critical match moments.
Editorial Prediction (May 25, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating various performance patterns reveals subtle advantages for Ganesan in second serve and return game statistics. These areas often dictate match dominance and might provide Ganesan a crucial edge over Olivo.
In high-pressure scenarios, which are frequent in competitive matches, Ganesan exhibits a superior capability to save breakpoints, potentially transforming the outcome of tight games.
Overall, Ganesan has excelled in converting breakpoints, a key aspect in overcoming opponents, combined with a superior winning record against a slightly easier pool of opponents.
Despite Olivo’s impressive performance history, particularly on clay and in deciding sets, the metrics indicate that Ganesan’s consistent edge in breakpoint conversion and under pressure situations position him as likely to win the forthcoming match.
Renzo Olivo vs Adhithya Ganesan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Olivo vs A. Ganesan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:10:37 | Average Match Time | 2:10:37 |
| 60% (47/78) | 1st Serve % | 61% (42/69) |
| 66% (31/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (20/42) |
| 29% (9/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 51% (35/69) | Return Points Win % | 49% (38/78) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Olivo Recent Matches Played
A. Ganesan Recent Matches Played

R. Olivo vs A. Ganesan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.52% (475/447) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.45% (56/45) |
| 50.73% (1114/1082) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.70% (128/106) |
| 50.02% (10510/10502) | Games Win/Loss | 52.13% (1165/1070) |
| 42.57% (43/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.69% (35/29) |
| 53.06% (425/376) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.00% (11/9) |
| 33.33% (4/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1733 | Aces Total | 360 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 3109 | Total Double Faults | 402 |
| 1:26:27 | Average Match Time | 1:43:35 |
| 547.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 393.97 |
| 61% (33746/55088) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4390/6977) |
| 66% (22254/33746) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2893/4390) |
| 47% (10110/21342) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1254/2587) |
| 42% (2330/5585) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (323/717) |
| 40% (22012/54609) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2794/6730) |
| 34.88% (15/28) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.37% (9/10) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (57/57) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 49.21% (279/288) | Challenger W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 64.61% (115/63) | Futures W/L | 57.78% (52/38) |
| 52% (469/902) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (55/100) |
| 20% (3/15) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (165/306) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (15/32) |
| 54% (183/340) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 82% (466/381) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (54/49) |
| 18% (466/85) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (54/5) |
| 21% (455/94) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (47/7) |